Eph/ephrin profiling in human breast cancer reveals significant associations between expression level and clinical outcome

116Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pre-clinical studies provide compelling evidence that Eph family receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and ligands promote cancer growth, neovascularization, invasion, and metastasis. Tumor suppressive roles have also been reported for the receptors, however, creating a potential barrier for clinical application. Determining how these observations relate to clinical outcome is a crucial step for translating the biological and mechanistic data into new molecularly targeted therapies. We investigated eph and ephrin expression in human breast cancer relative to endpoints of overall and/or recurrence-free survival in large microarray datasets. We also investigated protein expression in commercial human breast tissue microarrays (TMA) and Stage I prognostic TMAs linked to recurrence outcome data. We found significant correlations between ephA2, ephA4, ephA7, ephB4, and ephB6 and overall and/or recurrence-free survival in large microarray datasets. Protein expression in TMAs supported these trends. While observed no correlation between ephrin ligand expression and clinical outcome in microarray datasets, ephrin-A1 and EphA2 protein co-expression was significantly associated with recurrence in Stage I prognostic breast cancer TMAs. Our data suggest that several Eph family members are clinically relevant and tractable targets for intervention in human breast cancer. Moreover, profiling Eph receptor expression patterns in the context of relevant ligands and in the context of stage may be valuable in terms of diagnostics and treatment. © 2011 Brantley-Sieders et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brantley-Sieders, D. M., Jiang, A., Sarma, K., Badu-Nkansah, A., Walter, D. L., Shyr, Y., & Chen, J. (2011). Eph/ephrin profiling in human breast cancer reveals significant associations between expression level and clinical outcome. PLoS ONE, 6(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024426

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free