Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin

  • Hershberger E
  • Oprea S
  • Donabedian S
 et al. 
  • 15

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 57

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci from animal farms and the potential relation of resistance to antimicrobial use. METHODS: Enterococci from faecal samples from 18 beef cattle, 18 dairy cattle, 18 swine, 13 chicken, and eight turkey farms were prospectively evaluated over a 6 year period from 1998 to 2003. RESULTS: We evaluated 1256 isolates of Enterococcus faecium and 656 isolates of Enterococcus faecalis. None was vancomycin resistant. Quinupristin/dalfopristin, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin resistance rates in E. faecium were 2%, 0% and 55% in beef cattle, 8%, 7% and 47% in dairy cattle, 21%, 1% and 47% in swine, 85%, 12% and 23% in chicken, and 52%, 13% and 24% in turkey isolates, respectively. For E. faecalis, gentamicin resistance rates were 0% in beef cattle, 24% in dairy cattle, 37% in swine, 32% in chicken, and 29% in turkey isolates, whereas 12%, 9%, 21%, 64% and none of isolates from beef, dairy, swine, chicken, and turkey farms, respectively, were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Quinupristin/dalfopristin resistance in E. faecium was more common on chicken and turkey farms using virginiamycin (P

Author-supplied keywords

  • Antimicrobial use
  • Farms
  • Molecular analysis

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Ellie Hershberger

  • Simona F. Oprea

  • Susan M. Donabedian

  • Mary Perri

  • Pamela Bozigar

  • Paul Bartlett

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free