Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin

  • Hershberger E
  • Oprea S
  • Donabedian S
 et al. 
  • 40

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 58

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci from animal farms and the potential relation of resistance to antimicrobial use. METHODS: Enterococci from faecal samples from 18 beef cattle, 18 dairy cattle, 18 swine, 13 chicken, and eight turkey farms were prospectively evaluated over a 6 year period from 1998 to 2003. RESULTS: We evaluated 1256 isolates of Enterococcus faecium and 656 isolates of Enterococcus faecalis. None was vancomycin resistant. Quinupristin/dalfopristin, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin resistance rates in E. faecium were 2%, 0% and 55% in beef cattle, 8%, 7% and 47% in dairy cattle, 21%, 1% and 47% in swine, 85%, 12% and 23% in chicken, and 52%, 13% and 24% in turkey isolates, respectively. For E. faecalis, gentamicin resistance rates were 0% in beef cattle, 24% in dairy cattle, 37% in swine, 32% in chicken, and 29% in turkey isolates, whereas 12%, 9%, 21%, 64% and none of isolates from beef, dairy, swine, chicken, and turkey farms, respectively, were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Quinupristin/dalfopristin resistance in E. faecium was more common on chicken and turkey farms using virginiamycin (P

Author-supplied keywords

  • Antimicrobial use
  • Farms
  • Molecular analysis

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Ellie Hershberger

  • Simona F. Oprea

  • Susan M. Donabedian

  • Mary Perri

  • Pamela Bozigar

  • Paul Bartlett

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free