The Epidemiology of Major Depressive Disorder

  • Kessler R
  • Berglund P
  • Demler O
 et al. 
  • 60

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Context Uncertainties exist about prevalence and correlates of major depressive dis- order (MDD). Objective To present nationally representative data on prevalence and correlates of MDDby Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM- IV) criteria, and on study patterns and correlates of treatment and treatment ad- equacy from the recently completed National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Design Face-to-face household survey conducted from February 2001 to Decem- ber 2002. Setting The 48 contiguous United States. Participants Household residents ages 18 years or older (N=9090) who responded to the NCS-R survey. Main Outcome Measures Prevalence and correlates of MDD using the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), 12-month severity with the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self- Report (QIDS-SR), the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and the WHO disability assess- ment scale (WHO-DAS). Clinical reinterviews used the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. Results The prevalence of CIDIMDDfor lifetime was 16.2{%} (95{%} confidence inter- val [CI], 15.1-17.3) (32.6-35.1 million US adults) and for 12-month was 6.6{%} (95{%} CI, 5.9-7.3) (13.1-14.2 million US adults). Virtually all CIDI 12-month cases were inde- pendently classified as clinically significant using the QIDS-SR, with 10.4{%} mild, 38.6{%} moderate, 38.0{%} severe, and 12.9{%} very severe.Meanepisode duration was 16 weeks (95{%} CI, 15.1-17.3). Role impairment as measured by SDS was substantial as indicated by 59.3{%} of 12-month cases with severe or very severe role impairment. Most lifetime (72.1{%}) and 12-month (78.5{%}) cases had comorbid CIDI/DSM-IV disorders, withMDD only rarely primary. Although 51.6{%} (95{%} CI, 46.1-57.2) of 12-month cases received health care treatment forMDD,treatment was adequate in only 41.9{%} (95{%} CI, 35.9- 47.9) of these cases, resulting in 21.7{%} (95{%} CI, 18.1-25.2) of 12-monthMDDbeing adequately treated. Sociodemographic correlates of treatment were far less numerous than those of prevalence. Conclusions Major depressive disorder is a common disorder, widely distributed in the population, and usually associated with substantial symptom severity and role im- pairment. While the recent increase in treatment is encouraging, inadequate treat- ment is a serious concern. Emphasis on screening and expansion of treatment needs to be accompanied by a parallel emphasis on treatment quality improvement

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Rc Kessler

  • P Berglund

  • O Demler

  • R Jin

  • D Koretz

  • Kr Merikangas

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free