Epidural morphine vs hydromorphone in post-caesarean section patients

  • Halpern S
  • Arellano R
  • Preston R
 et al. 
  • 10


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 32


    Citations of this article.


PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized controlled double blind study was to compare the efficacy of pain relief and the side effects of epidural hydromorphone and morphine in post-Caesarean patients. METHODS: In all patients, epidural anaesthesia was induced using carbonated lidocaine 2% with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 50 micrograms fentanyl, given in incremental doses. Patients in Group 1 (n = 24) received 0.6 mg hydromorphone and patients in Group 2 (n = 22) received 3 mg morphine after delivery of the infant. Pain, pruritus and nausea were measured using a visual analog scale (at times: baseline, on admission to the recovery room, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hr postoperatively), by the number of requests for additional medications and by an overall satisfaction score. RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups in pain relief of in the incidence and severity of side effects. Pruritus was more pronounced within the first six hours in Group 1 and at 18 hr in Group 2. CONCLUSION: Hydromorphone provides no clinical benefit over epidural morphine for post operative analgesia following Caesarean section.

Author-supplied keywords

  • ANAESTHESIA: obstetrical, caesarean section, epidural
  • ANALGESIA: postoperative, side effects
  • ANALGESICS: morphine, hydromorphone, RCT

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Stephen H. Halpern

  • Ramiro Arellano

  • Roanne Preston

  • Jan Carstoniu

  • Gerry O'Leary

  • Sandra Roger

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free