Epinephrine in resuscitation: Curse or cure?

23Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The use of epinephrine during cardiac arrest has been advocated for decades and forms an integral part of the published guidelines. Its efficacy is supported by animal data, but human trial evidence is lacking. This is partly attributable to disparities in trial methodology. Epinephrines pharmacologic and physiologic effects include an increase in coronary perfusion pressure that is key to successful resuscitation. One possible explanation for the lack of epinephrines demonstrated efficacy in human trials of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is the delay in its administration. A potential solution may be intraosseus epinephrine, which can be administered quicker. More importantly, it is the quality of the basic life support, early and uninterrupted chest compressions, early defibrillation and postresuscitation care that will provide the best chance of neurologically intact survival. © 2010 Future Medicine Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Attaran, R. R., & Ewy, G. A. (2010, July). Epinephrine in resuscitation: Curse or cure? Future Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.2217/fca.10.24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free