Errores en las Referencias Bibliográfi cas de las Revistas Médicas Peruanas

  • Huamani C
  • Pacheco-Romero J
  • 3


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


INTRODUCTION: References are fundamental in our studies; an adequate selection is asimportant as an adequate description. OBJECTIVES: To determine the number of errors in a sample of references found in Peruvian medical journals. METHODS: We reviewed 515 scientific papers references selected by systematic randomized sampling and corroborated reference information with the original document or its citation in Pubmed, LILACS or SciELO-Peru. RESULTS: We found errors in 47,6% (245) of the references, identifying 372 types of errors; the most frequent were errors in presentation style (120), authorship (100) and title (100), mainly due to spelling mistakes (91). CONCLUSIONS: References error percentage was high, varied and multiple. We suggest systematic revision of references in the editorial process as well as to extend the discussion on this theme. KEYWORDS: references, periodicals, research, bibliometrics.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Periodicals as Topic
  • Peru
  • Publishing
  • Writing
  • standards

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Charles Huamani

  • Jose Pacheco-Romero

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free