Ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology-Interdisciplinary links with the historical sciences

146Citations
Citations of this article
215Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper we use three disparate examples to highlight the relevance of historical methods in the context of ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology. Unfortunately, in ethnopharmacology we have only very few examples where such historical depth is possible. On the other hand the first hand data available through ethnopharmacological research, may be of relevance for interpreting historical information. Three distinct methods were used successfully in the retrospective exploration of diachronic data. In order to gain an insight into historical developments in the use of plant species and evolution of pharmacopoeias we used a botanico-historical approach (Rosmarinus officinalis), one that combines linguistic and statistical methods (Popoluca/Mixe), and one that uses historical documentary evidence (Ch'orti). We hope that this methodological discussion encourages a wider use of such historical methods in ethnopharmacology and related areas of research. © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heinrich, M., Kufer, J., Leonti, M., & Pardo-de-Santayana, M. (2006, September 19). Ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology-Interdisciplinary links with the historical sciences. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. Elsevier Ireland Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.05.035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free