Euthanasia and distinctive horizons of moral reasoning.

  • Turner L
  • 8

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Rather than articulating and defending a particular normative stance concerning assisted suicide and euthanasia, attention here is directed toward the background, often tacit, interpretive horizons within which such judgements are formulated. Historical transformations can alter the contours of moral reflection, so that what is construed as 'reasonable' and 'common sensical' can shift over time. When core presuppositions constituting the public moral imagination undergo considerable change, what was once placed beyond dispute can become a site for open disagreement or widespread public affirmation. Four distinctive historical themes related to the contemporary debate concerning assisted suicide and euthanasia are addressed. First, the medicalization of dying and death is explored. Second, the paper addresses the way in which the bureaucratization of dying places decision-making near the end of life within the realm of public moral deliberation. Third, tensions between competing sources of moral authority are explored. Finally, conflicting understandings of human suffering are described.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Ethics
  • Euthanasia -- Ethical Issues
  • Religion and Religions
  • Suffering
  • Suicide, Assisted -- Ethical Issues
  • United States

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • L Turner

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free