Evaluating Holland's and Gati's vocational-interest models: A structural meta-analysis.

  • Tracey T
  • Rounds J
232Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In a recent review, Gati (1991) Criticized Holland's model of vocational interests and concluded that his own hierarchical model was superior. A major problem with Gati's comparison of his and Holland's models was that it was based on an incomplete specification of Holland's model. The relative validity of Holland's order and circumplex models and Gati's 3-group partition model as they fit 104 published (1965-1989) correlation matrices is evaluated. Using 3 separate structural meta-analytic techniques (Hubert & Arabie's, 1987, randomization test of hypothesized order relations, confirmatory factor analysis, and individual-differences cluster analysis), the fit of Holland's and Gati's models to the data were compared. Holland's order and circumplex models were found to be adequate representations of the structure of vocational personalities and work environments and were found to be superior to Gati's model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tracey, T. J., & Rounds, J. B. (1993). Evaluating Holland’s and Gati’s vocational-interest models: A structural meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.229

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free