• 1

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Evaluators today have many more evaluation approaches available to them than in 1960. As they address the challenges of the 21st century, it is an opportune time to consider what 20th century evaluation developments are valuable for future use and which ones would best be left behind. I have, in this monograph, attempted to sort twenty-two alternative evaluation approaches into what fishermen sometimes call the " keepers " and the " throwbacks. " More importantly, I have characterized each approach; assessed its strengths and weaknesses; and considered whether, when, and how it is best applied. The reviewed approaches emerged mainly in the U.S. between 1960 and 1999. 20th Century Expansion of Program Evaluation Approaches Following a period of relative inactivity in the 1950s, a succession of inter-national and national forces stimulated the expansion and development of evaluation theory and practice. The main influences were the efforts to vastly strengthen the U.S. defense system spawned by the Soviet Union's 1957 launching of Sputnik I; the new U.S. laws in the 1960s to equitably serve minorities and persons with disabilities; federal government evalua-tion requirements of the Great Society programs initiated in 1965; the U.S. movement begun in the 1970s to hold educational and social organizations accountable for both prudent use of resources and achievement of objec-tives; the stress on excellence in the 1980s as a means of increasing U.S. international competitiveness; and the trend in the 1990s for various organizations—both inside and outside the U.S.—to employ evaluation to ensure quality, competitiveness, and equity in delivering services. In pur-suing reforms, American society has repeatedly pressed schools and col-leges, health-care organizations, and various social welfare enterprises to show through evaluation whether or not services and improvement efforts were succeeding. The development of program evaluation as a field of professional prac-tice was also spurred by a number of seminal writings. These included, in

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

There are no full text links

Authors

  • Daniel L Stufflebeam

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free