Evaluation of PCR primers for universal nifH gene targeting and for assessment of transcribed nifH pools in roots of Oryza longistaminata with and without low nitrogen input

26Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The bias of widely used degenerate nifH-specific primer sets was first tested using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), and their application for profiling of complex communities assessed for roots of Oryza longistaminata. When primers (P) with mismatches at nondegenerate positions were used on genomic DNA of Azotobacter vinelandii, which harbors three single divergent nifH genes, template-to-product ratios were highly skewed. In contrast, we obtained no evidence for a large PCR bias when we used highly degenerate primers with no mismatches (Z). Similar results were obtained for reverse transcription (RT)-PCR amplifications from root RNA from O. longistaminata grown at the river bed of the Okavango, where Z-primers detected a more complex nifH pool, corroborating that the P-primers are quite biased in the nifH sequences they amplify. In microcosms of O. longistaminata grown in the phytotron in the presence or absence of constant low nitrogen input (25 kg NH4NO3 ha-1 year-1), roots of nitrogen-treated plants showed similar, slightly higher levels of nifH-mRNA. However, nitrogen treatment had a strong effect on the composition and diversity of expressed nifH pools that shifted towards methylotroph-related nitrogenases. Thus the active population of diazotrophs was not resistant towards low rates of nitrogen input and decreased significantly in richness, as also observed for plant species richness in grasslands by others.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Demba Diallo, M., Reinhold-Hurek, B., & Hurek, T. (2008). Evaluation of PCR primers for universal nifH gene targeting and for assessment of transcribed nifH pools in roots of Oryza longistaminata with and without low nitrogen input. In FEMS Microbiology Ecology (Vol. 65, pp. 220–228). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00545.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free