Externally cued and internally generated selection: differences in distractor analysis and inhibition.

  • Baylis G
  • Tipper S
  • Houghton G
  • 27


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 26


    Citations of this article.


In most studies of selective attention, the experimenter informs the participant what the target is and what action is required. For example, participants may be told to name the red drawing. The present study shows that under such conditions of external selection, distractor inhibition is used to ensure that selection is efficient. In external selection, analysis of distractors is limited, causing later recognition of distractor items to be poor. In contrast, during real-world selection a person may be confronted with a number of potential targets and may have to decide what will be the target for action. Under these conditions of internal selection, inhibition of distracting information does not occur. Moreover, distractors are more fully analyzed and thus better recognized at a later test.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Attention
  • Cues
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Inhibition (Psychology)
  • Male
  • Reaction Time
  • Visual Perception

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • G C Baylis

  • S P Tipper

  • G Houghton

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free