The fallacy of the ecological fallacy: The potential misuse of a concept and the consequences

568Citations
Citations of this article
493Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ecological studies have been evaluated in epidemiological contexts in terms of the 'ecological fallacy.' Although the empirical evidence for a lack of comparability between correlations derived from ecological- and individual-level analyses is compelling, the conceptual meaning of the ecological fallacy remains problematic. This paper argues that issues in cross-level inference can be usefully conceptualized as validity problems, problems not peculiar to ecological-level analyses. Such an approach increases the recognition of both potential inference problems in individual- level studies and the unique contributions of ecological variables. This, in turn, expands the terrain for the location of causes for disease and interventions to improve the public's health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schwartz, S. (1994). The fallacy of the ecological fallacy: The potential misuse of a concept and the consequences. American Journal of Public Health, 84(5), 819–824. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.84.5.819

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free