Fern richness, tree species surrogacy, and fragment complementarity in a Mexican tropical montane cloud forest

20Citations
Citations of this article
118Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We related pteridophytes versus tree species composition to identify surrogate measures of diversity, and complementarity of seven cloud forest fragments. Forest structure, and fern and tree composition were determined in 70 (2 x 50 m) transects. Fern density (10,150-25,080 individuals/ha) differed among sites. We recorded 83 fern species in the transects. Nonparametric richness estimators indicated that more sampling effort was needed to complete fern inventories (14 more species). However, ferns recorded outside of the transects increased richness to 103 species (six more species than predicted). Twenty-eight species were unique and rare due to special habitat requirements (Diplazium expansum, Hymenophyllum hirsutum, Melpomene leptostoma, Terpsichore asplenifolia), or were at a geographical distribution edge (Diplazium plantaginifolium, Lycopodium thyoides, Pecluma consimilis, Polypodium puberulum). Correlations between fern richness and tree richness and density were not significant, but were significant between fern richness and fern density, between epiphytic fern density and tree richness and density. Tree richness is not a good surrogate for fern diversity. Only three species were recorded in all fragments (Polypodium lepidotrichum, P. longepinnulatum, P. plebeium); thus fragments' pteridophytes compositions are highly complementary, but more similar for ferns than for trees. A regional conservation approach which includes many small reserves needs to focus supplementarity on patterns of tree and fern species richness. © Springer 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams-Linera, G., Palacios-Rios, M., & Hernández-Gómez, R. (2005). Fern richness, tree species surrogacy, and fragment complementarity in a Mexican tropical montane cloud forest. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(1), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-4053-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free