Finishing strong: Recency effects in juror judgments

  • Costabile K
  • Klein S
  • 32


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 15


    Citations of this article.


We investigated the effects of evidence order on juror verdicts. Results from 4 mock juror stud- ies suggest that incriminating evidence is more likely to lead to a guilty verdict when it is pre- sented late in the trial than when it is presented early. This recency effect was found both with admissible and inadmissible evidence. Further analyses suggested that recency effects may have been mediated by jurors’memory of the incriminating evidence: Evidence presented late in a trial was more likely to be remembered by jurors and thus more likely to have influenced their verdicts. Implications for the judicial system and juror decision making are discussed.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Kristi A. Costabile

  • Stanley B. Klein

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free