Firm, market and top management antecedents of speculation: Lessons for corporate governance

5Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the corporate governance traits of companies that posted hefty losses related to derivatives trading in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Using concepts from agency theory, cognitive decision making and institutional theory we theorize on potential facilitators of trading losses. Our sample is comprised of 346 companies from 10 international markets, of which 49 companies (and a subsample of 14 distressed companies) lost an aggregate of US$18.9 billion in derivatives. An event study shows that most companies experience substantial and long-term abnormal returns following these incidents. The results of a probit model indicate that the lack of a formal hedging policy, weak monitoring of the top management, overconfidence in technical trends, hubris and remuneration contribute to the mismanagement of hedging policies. Our study contributes to the existing financial risk management literature by identifying antecedents of derivatives losses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zeidan, R., & Müllner, J. (2015). Firm, market and top management antecedents of speculation: Lessons for corporate governance. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 3233, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2015.08.001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free