Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates "Waltz Before A Blind Audience?"

  • Aldrich J
  • Sullivan J
  • Borgida E
  • 126


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 279


    Citations of this article.


JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact VWhile candidates regularly spend much time and effort cam-paigning on foreign and defense policies, the thrust of prevailing scholarly opinion is that voters possess little information and weak attitudes on these issues, which therefore have negligible impact on their voting behavior. We resolve this anomaly by arguing that public attitudes on foreign and defense policies are available and cognitively accessi-ble, that the public has perceived clear differences between the candidates on these issues in recent elections, and that these issues have affected the public's vote choices. Data indicate that these conclusions are appropriate for foreign affairs issues and domestic issues.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • John H. Aldrich

  • John L. Sullivan

  • Eugene Borgida

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free