Skip to content
Journal article

Formation of secondary aerosols over Europe: Comparison of two gas-phase chemical mechanisms

Kim Y, Sartelet K, Seigneur C ...see all

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 11, issue 2 (2011) pp. 583-598

  • 28

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 27

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
  • N/A

    Views

    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

The impact of two recent gas-phase chemical ki-netic mechanisms (CB05 and RACM2) on the formation of secondary inorganic and organic aerosols is compared for simulations of PM 2.5 over Europe between 15 July and 15 August 2001. The host chemistry transport model is Po-lair3D of the Polyphemus air-quality platform. Particulate matter is modeled with a sectional aerosol model (SIREAM), which is coupled to the thermodynamic model ISORROPIA for inorganic species and to a module (MAEC) that treats both hydrophobic and hydrophilic species for secondary or-ganic aerosol (SOA). Modifications are made to the gas-phase chemical mechanisms to handle the formation of SOA. In order to isolate the effect of the original chemical mecha-nisms on PM formation, the addition of reactions and chemi-cal species needed for SOA formation was harmonized to the extent possible between the two gas-phase chemical mecha-nisms. Model performance is satisfactory with both mecha-nisms for speciated PM 2.5 . The monthly-mean difference of the concentration of PM 2.5 is less than 1 µg m −3 (6%) over the entire domain. Secondary chemical components of PM 2.5 include sulfate, nitrate, ammonium and organic aerosols, and the chemical composition of PM 2.5 is not significantly differ-ent between the two mechanisms. Monthly-mean concentra-tions of inorganic aerosol are higher with RACM2 than with CB05 (+16% for sulfate, +11% for nitrate, and +10% for am-monium), whereas the concentrations of organic aerosols are slightly higher with CB05 than with RACM2 (+22% for an-thropogenic SOA and +1% for biogenic SOA). Differences in the inorganic and organic aerosols result primarily from differences in oxidant concentrations (OH, O 3 and NO 3). Ni-trate formation tends to be HNO 3 -limited over land and dif-ferences in the concentrations of nitrate are due to differences in concentration of HNO 3 . Differences in aerosols formed Correspondence to: Y. Kim (kimy@cerea.enpc.fr) from aromatic SVOC are due to different aromatic oxida-tion between CB05 and RACM2. The aromatic oxidation in CB05 leads to more cresol formation, which then leads to more SOA. Differences in the aromatic aerosols would be significantly reduced with the recent CB05-TU mechanism for toluene oxidation. Differences in the biogenic aerosols are due to different oxidant concentrations (monoterpenes) and different particulate organic mass concentrations affect-ing the gas-particle partitioning of SOA (isoprene). These results show that the formulation of a gas-phase chemical ki-netic mechanism for ozone can have significant direct (e.g., cresol formation) and indirect (e.g., oxidant levels) effects on PM formation. Furthermore, the incorporation of SOA into an existing gas-phase chemical kinetic mechanism requires the addition of reactions and product species, which should be conducted carefully to preserve the original mechanism design and reflect current knowledge of SOA formation pro-cesses (e.g., NO x dependence of some SOA yields). The development of chemical kinetic mechanisms, which offer sufficient detail for both oxidant and SOA formation is rec-ommended.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below