A Framework for Using Consequential Validity Evidence in Evaluating Large-Scale Writing Assessments: A Canadian Study

  • Slomp D
  • Corrigan J
  • Sugimoto T
  • 25


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 3


    Citations of this article.


The increasing diversity of students in contemporary classrooms and the concomitant increase in large-scale testing programs highlight the importance of developing writing assessment programs that are sensitive to the challenges of assessing diverse populations. To this end, this article provides a framework for conducting consequential validity research on large-scale writing assessment programs. It illustrates this validity model through a series of instrumental case studies drawing on the research literature conducted on writing assessment programs in Canada. The authors derived the cases from a systematic review of the literature published between January 2000 and December 2012 that directly examined the consequences of large-scale writing assessment on writing instruction in Canadian schools. They argue that, this model of constructing consequential validity research provides researchers, test developers, and test users with a clearer, more systematic approach to examining the effects of assessment on diverse populations of students. They also argue that, this model will enable the development of stronger, more integrated validity arguments.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Job analysis
  • Methods
  • Validity
  • assessment
  • rhetoric and composition
  • validity

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

  • ISSN: 0034527X
  • SGR: 84894213183
  • PUI: 372406149
  • SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-84894213183


  • David H Slomp

  • Julie A Corrigan

  • Tamiko Sugimoto

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free