Journal article

The full story of the electron configurations of the transition elements

Eugen Schwarz W ...see all

Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 87, issue 4 (2010) pp. 444-448

  • 86


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 16


    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference


The dominant electronic valence configurations of atoms in chemical substances of a transition element of group G in period n is (n 1)dGns0. Transition-metal chemistry is d orbital chemistry. In contrast, the ground states of free, unbound atoms derive, in most cases, from configurations (n 1)dG1ns1 or (n 1)dG2ns2. Five features must be considered to resolve this paradox. Point (i), the ds orbitalenergy distance in relation to the averaged differences of dd, ds, and ss two-electron repulsion energies, has often been discussed in the literature. However, four equally important features are (ii) the different two-electron repulsion energies within the d shell; (iii) the spinorbit coupling energies in the d shell;and, in particular, (iv) the d-orbital collapse below the s level for increasing nuclear charge around group 3 and (v) the different perturbations of the valence (n 1)d and ns orbitals when a free atom enters an alloy or compound. There is a conceptual difference between spectroscopic ground states and chemically dominant ground configurations. The ground states of unbound atoms mentioned in most chemistry textbooks have little meaning in chemistry.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • W. H. Eugen Schwarz

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free