Further exploration of the effect of "diagnosis threat" on cognitive performance in individuals with mild head injury

124Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The present study further explored the phenomenon of "diagnosis threat" (Suhr & Gunstad, 2002), by examining the potential explanatory roles of anxiety, effort, and depression. Individuals with mild head injury history were randomly assigned to receive either neutral instructions (controls, N = 25) or to have attention called to their head injury history as a reason for invitation into the study (diagnosis threat, N = 28). Depression was measured at baseline. Following the neuropsychological battery, ratings of effort, test pressure, and state anxiety were completed. The diagnosis threat group performed worse than controls on attention/working memory, psychomotor speed, and memory tasks, but not on measures of executive functioning, post-test anxiety, or effort. Effort, anxiety and depression were not related to cognitive performance, nor did depression interact with expectations in explaining group differences in performance. Results provide further support for the "diagnosis threat" effect, but offer no support for effort, anxiety, or depression explanations for diminished performance. Copyright © 2005 INS. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suhr, J. A., & Gunstad, J. (2005). Further exploration of the effect of “diagnosis threat” on cognitive performance in individuals with mild head injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617705050010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free