Futile choices: Wooing doctors to acknowledge the law in Queensland

  • Parker M
  • 5

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 2

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

End-of-life decision-making continues to challenge health care providers, patients, families, regulators and judges. The Queensland State Coroner's findings in the 2009 inquest into the death of June Woo resulted in a submission from concerned clinicians to the Queensland Law Reform Commission's review of the State's guardianship regime, claiming that the judgment held problematic implications for future practice. This column summarises the State Coroner's findings and recommendations, and critically analyses the clinical response, focusing on consent requirements that, while peculiar to Queensland, illustrate continuing tensions surrounding decision-making conflicts at the end of life.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Australia
  • aged
  • article
  • custodial care
  • female
  • human
  • informed consent
  • legal aspect
  • mental capacity
  • policy
  • resuscitation

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

  • SGR: 79952108176
  • PMID: 20977159
  • ISBN: 1320-159X
  • PUI: 360238650
  • SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-79952108176
  • ISSN: 1320-159X

Authors

  • M Parker

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free