Skip to content
Journal article

Generalization practices in qualitative research: A mixed methods case study

Onwuegbuzie A, Leech N ...see all

Quality and Quantity, vol. 44, issue 5 (2010) pp. 881-892

  • 40

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 6

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
  • N/A

    Views

    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

The purpose of this mixed methods case study was to examine the generalization practices in qualitative research published in a reputable qualitative journal. In order to accomplish this, all qualitative research articles published in Qualitative Report since its inception in 1990 (n = 273) were examined. A quantitative analysis of the all 125 empirical qualitative research articles revealed that a significant proportion (i.e., 29.6%) of studies involved generalizations beyond the underlying sample that were made inappropriately by the author(s). A qualitative analysis identified the types of over-generalizations that occurred, which included making general recommendations for future practice and providing general policy implications based only on a few cases. Thus, a significant proportion of articles published in Qualitative Report lack what we call interpretive consistency.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Analytic generalization
  • Case study
  • Generalization
  • Interpretive consistency
  • Mixed methods
  • Qualitative research
  • Sample size
  • Sampling
  • Sequential mixed methods analysis
  • Statistical generalization

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie

  • Nancy L. Leech

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below