The generation and resemblance heuristics in face recognition: Cooperation and competition

  • Kleider H
  • Goldinger S
  • 48


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 4


    Citations of this article.


Like all probabilistic decisions, recognition memory judgments are based on inferences about the strength and quality of stimulus familiarity. In recent articles, B. W. A. Whittlesea and J. Leboe (2000; J. Leboe & B. W. A. Whittlesea, 2002) proposed that such memory decisions entail various heuristics, similar to well-known heuristics in overt decision making. Using verbal stimulus materials, Whittlesea and Leboe illustrated 3 separate memory heuristics: fluency, generation, and resemblance. In the present investigation, the authors examined the generation and resemblance heuristics in face recognition. In 12 experiments, people memorized faces and later performed exclusion (source memory) tasks. Every experiment contained natural groups of facial photographs (e.g., Caucasian vs. Asian faces), but such groups were not always valid source-memory predictors. Instead, across experiments, the potential utility of generation and resemblance strategies was systematically varied. People were quite sensitive to such variations, changing from one heuristic to another as needed. However, they also combined heuristics, both improving and damaging performance across conditions. The relevance of recognition decision heuristics to eyewitness memory is considered.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Face recognition
  • Generation
  • Heuristics
  • Recognition memory
  • Resemblance

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Stephen GoldingerSchool of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University

  • Heather M. Kleider

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free