Generational Differences in Academic Achievement Among Immigrant Youths: A Meta-Analytic Review

64Citations
Citations of this article
155Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Research on generational differences in immigrant youths’ academic achievement has yielded conflicting findings. This meta-analysis reconciles discrepant findings by testing meta-analytic moderators. Fifty-three studies provided 74 comparisons on academic outcomes. First- and second-generation youths did not significantly differ on academic achievement (Hedges’s g =.01), and second-generation students performed slightly better than third-or-later–generation peers (g =.12). Moderation tests indicated that second-generation immigrants outperformed first-generation students on standardized tests (g =.20) and earned better grades than third-or-later–generation peers (g =.20). Immigrant advantage was stronger for Asian, low-socioeconomic, and community samples. Immigrant advantage may be overestimated in studies that use self-reported rather than school-reported achievement. Together, our results suggest a small, heterogeneous second-generation immigrant advantage that varies by immigrant population and study characteristics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duong, M. T., Badaly, D., Liu, F. F., Schwartz, D., & McCarty, C. A. (2016). Generational Differences in Academic Achievement Among Immigrant Youths: A Meta-Analytic Review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 3–41. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315577680

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free