'Good' State vs. 'Bad' Warlords? A Critique of State-Building Strategies in Afghanistan

  • Giustozzi A
  • 28


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


The current Afghan government, having weak social roots has been forced to rely on the support of ‘warlords’ to stay in power. But a high price had to be paid. Despite the predominant stress in much current analysis on the issue of regional warlordism, the limited reform achievements in the Kabul ministries and the enduring domination by the militias of some key ministries are potentially much more threatening to the reform and re-establishment of the Afghan state. Widespread corruption is preventing some key ministries from achieving the minimal effectiveness required. Even within Kabul, the focus of the international community has been misplaced. In particular, the pressure of donors on the Ministry of the Interior has been nowhere near as strong as that exerted over the Ministry of Finance. The international community also failed to support adequately the attempts by ‘civil society’ to change the corrupt practices of the state administration.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Afghanistan
  • Afghanistan: US Invasion and Anti-Terror Operation
  • Capacity Building
  • Central Government
  • Confidence Building Measures
  • Government Reform
  • Institution Building
  • Institutional Reform
  • International Security
  • Legitimacy
  • Nation Building
  • Political Elites
  • Political Reform
  • Public Administration
  • Regional Security
  • Research Papers & Working Papers
  • Warlordism

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Antonio Giustozzi

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free