Are growth parameters estimated from tagging and age–length data comparable?

  • Francis R
  • 59

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 129

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The two most common ways of estimating fish growth use age-length data and tagging data. It is shown that growth parameters estimated from these two types of data have different meanings and thus are not directly comparable. In particular, the von Bertalanffy parameter B, means asymptotic mean length at age for age-length data, and maximum length for tagging data, when estimated by conventional methods. New parameterinations are given for the von Bertalanffy equation which avoid this ambiguity and better represent the growth information in the two types of data. The comparison between growth estimates from these data sets is shown to be equivalent to comparing the mean growth rate of fish of a given age with that of fish of length equal to the mean length at that age. How much these growth rates may differ in real populations remains unresolved: estimates for two species of fish produced markedly different results, neither of which could be reproduced using growth models. Existing growth models are shown to be inadequate to answer this question. Les

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • R.I.C.C. Francis

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free