Guidelines on the assessment of bleeding risk prior to surgery or invasive procedures: British Committee for Standards in Haematology

  • Chee Y
  • Crawford J
  • Watson H
 et al. 
  • 158


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 193


    Citations of this article.


Unselected coagulation testing is widely practiced in the process of assessing bleeding risk prior to surgery. This may delay surgery inappropriately and cause unnecessary concern in patients who are found to have 'abnormal' tests. In addition it is associated with a significant cost. This systematic review was performed to determine whether patient bleeding history and unselected coagulation testing predict abnormal perioperative bleeding. A literature search of Medline between 1966 and 2005 was performed to identify appropriate studies. Studies that contained enough data to allow the calculation of the predictive value and likelihood ratios of tests for perioperative bleeding were included. Nine observational studies (three prospective) were identified. The positive predictive value (0.03-0.22) and likelihood ratio (0.94-5.1) for coagulation tests indicate that they are poor predictors of bleeding. Patients undergoing surgery should have a bleeding history taken. This should include detail of previous surgery and trauma, a family history, and detail of anti-thrombotic medication. Patients with a negative bleeding history do not require routine coagulation screening prior to surgery.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Bleeding
  • Clinical history
  • Coagulation screen
  • Surgery

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Y. L. Chee

  • J. C. Crawford

  • H. G. Watson

  • M. Greaves

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free