Health-related quality of life of patients with advanced breast cancer treated with everolimus plus exemestane versus placebo plus exemestane in the phase 3, randomized, controlled, BOLERO-2 trial.

  • Burris HA Rugo HS, Beck JT, Piccart M, Neven P, Baselga J, Petrakova K, Hortobagyi GN, Komorowski A, Chouinard E, Young R, Gnant M, Pritchard KI, Bennett L, Ricci JF, Bauly H, Taran T, Sahmoud T, Noguchi S L
  • 1

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The randomized, controlled BOLERO-2 (Breast Cancer Trials of Oral Everolimus) trial demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival with the use of everolimus plus exemestane (EVE + EXE) versus placebo plus exemestane (PBO + EXE) in patients with advanced breast cancer who developed disease progression after treatment with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. This analysis investigated the treatment effects on health-related quality of life (HRQOL)., METHODS: Using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire, HRQOL was assessed at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter until disease progression and/or treatment discontinuation. The 30 items in 15 subscales of the QLQ-C30 include global health status wherein higher scores (range, 0-100) indicate better HRQOL. This analysis included a protocol-specified time to definitive deterioration (TDD) analysis at a 5% decrease in HRQOL versus baseline, with no subsequent increase above this threshold. The authors report additional sensitivity analyses using 10-point minimal important difference decreases in the global health status score versus baseline. Treatment arms were compared using the stratified log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for trial stratum (visceral metastases, previous hormone sensitivity), age, sex, race, baseline global health status score and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, prognostic risk factors, and treatment history., RESULTS: Baseline global health status scores were found to be similar between treatment groups (64.7 vs 65.3). The median TDD in HRQOL was 8.3 months with EVE + EXE versus 5.8 months with PBO + EXE (hazard ratio, 0.74; P = .0084). At the 10-point minimal important difference, the median TDD with EVE + EXE was 11.7 months versus 8.4 months with PBO + EXE (hazard ratio, 0.80; P = .1017)., CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced breast cancer who develop disease progression after treatment with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors, EVE + EXE was associated with a longer TDD in global HRQOL versus PBO + EXE.

Author-supplied keywords

  • *Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/tu
  • *Breast Neoplasms/dt [Drug Therapy]
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Androstadienes/ad [Administration & Dosage]
  • Aromatase Inhibitors/ad [Administration & Dosage]
  • Breast Neoplasms/pa [Pathology]
  • Breast Neoplasms/px [Psychology]
  • Disease Progression
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Health Status
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Odds Ratio
  • Postmenopause
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Quality of Life
  • Questionnaires
  • Sirolimus/aa [Analogs & Derivatives]
  • Sirolimus/ad [Administration & Dosage]
  • Treatment Outcome

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Lebrun F Burris HA Rugo HS, Beck JT, Piccart M, Neven P, Baselga J, Petrakova K, Hortobagyi GN, Komorowski A, Chouinard E, Young R, Gnant M, Pritchard KI, Bennett L, Ricci JF, Bauly H, Taran T, Sahmoud T, Noguchi S

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free