Hearing results in stapes surgery using two different prosthesis

ISSN: 00351334
18Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim of the study: Evaluation of hearing results after implantation of a fluoroplastic-platinum piston (FP) and of a titanium piston (T) with a shaft diameter of respectively O.6 mm and 0.4 mm, in cases of otosclerosis requiring stapedotomy. Material and methods: Pre-operative and post-operative hearing results obtained after primary stapedotomy by implantation of 30 FP and 30 T performed by the same expert author (C.Z.) were reviewed. In each patient we evaluated pre- and post-operative auditory thresholds, as recommended. Results: All patients of both groups showed a significant air-bone gap (ABG) improvement for all frequencies after surgery (P<0.001). Post-operative ABG comparison between the two groups showed a better ABG for lower frequencies in the FP group and for higher frequencies in the T group, but the difference was not significant. No post-operative complications, including sensorineural hearing loss, were found. Bone conduction improvement was better in the FP group than in the T one and this difference was statistically significant at 1000 and 2000 Hz. There was no statistically significant difference in the post-operative outcomes between the two prosthesis. Better results of FP for lower frequencies suggest that an increase in diameter of the prosthesis results in a greater improvement in the hearing of threshold at low frequencies, while a decrease of diameter results in a greater improvement in the hearing threshold at high frequencies, as indicated by previous international studies. Conclusion: Our data shows that titanium piston is as good as fluoroplastic piston in stapes surgery for otosclerosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casale, M., De Franco, A., Salvinelli, F., Piazza, F., Vincenzi, A., & Zini, C. (2003). Hearing results in stapes surgery using two different prosthesis. Revue de Laryngologie Otologie Rhinologie, 124(4), 255–258.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free