Heightening Comparativists' Concern for Model Choice: Voting Behavior in Great Britain and the Netherlands

  • Whitten G
  • Palmer H
  • 54

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 62

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

As the research methodology more closely approximates the causal process being analyzed, the inferences and predictions derived from that methodology will better represent actual behavior. Statistical models were specified on the basis of accepted theories of voting behavior and political cleavages in the Netherlands and Great Britain. We hypothesize that multinomial models provide a more accurate characterization of voting behavior in countries with more than two political parties competing for votes. Binomial logit, multinomial logit, and nested multinomial logit models of voting behavior are estimated on Dutch and British National Election Study data. Compared to binomial methods, we find that multinomial models of voting behavior produce results that are more congruent with accepted theories of Dutch and British politics. CR - Copyright © 1996 Midwest Political Science Association

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Guy Whitten

  • Harvey D Palmer

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free