Hidden consequences of the group-serving bias: Causal attributions and the quality of group decision making

  • Goncalo J
  • Duguid M
  • 114


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 13


    Citations of this article.


A long stream of research in attribution theory suggests that groups are biased toward attributing their success to factors that are internal to their group. However, the existing research has confounded two types of attributions that are both internal to the group, but theoretically distinct: (1) attributions that differentiate between the contributions made by each individual group member and (2) attributions that focus on the group as a whole. This dichotomy is important because, drawing on theories of social influence, we predict that different types of attributions will have different consequences for the quality of group decision making. In Experiment 1, individually focused attributions for past success caused groups to consider more divergent alternatives prior to making a shared decision. In Experiment 2, individually focused attributions for past success facilitated the sharing of unique information and improved decision accuracy. These findings suggest that the group-serving tendency to internalize success may have important consequences for group performance that have not yet been considered in current research. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Causal attribution
  • Decision making
  • Divergent thinking
  • Group-serving bias
  • Knowledge exchange

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Jack A. Goncalo

  • Michelle M. Duguid

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free