Hiding the politically obvious

  • Perez V
  • 18


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


What have colleges and universities done to increase student of color enroll- ment since the 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger? This article provides a critical race theory (CRT) snapshot of selective data and institutions since these landmark decisions. We find that even though Grutter gives the go-ahead to use affirmative action, higher education has failed politically to take on this challenge. When taken together, the Gratz and Grutter decisions allow higher education institutions to engage in symbolic affirmative action measures that appear as diversity measures but are operationalized as race neutral when one examines the data of continuing overall declines of students of color at many institutions. The authors con- clude with a CRT call for a more expansive affirmative action with higher edu- cation administrators doing more to justify affirmative action through Grutter.

Author-supplied keywords

  • affirmative action
  • critical race theory
  • higher education

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Victor H Perez

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free