at High Clinical Risk

  • Cannon T
  • Cadenhead K
  • Cornblatt B
 et al. 
  • 57


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


Context: Early detection and prospective evaluation of in-dividuals who will develop schizophrenia or other psy-chotic disorders are critical to efforts to isolate mecha-nisms underlying psychosis onset and to the testing of preventive interventions, but existing risk prediction ap-proaches have achieved only modest predictive accuracy. Objectives: To determine the risk of conversion to psy-chosis and to evaluate a set of prediction algorithms maxi-mizingpositivepredictivepowerinaclinicalhigh-risksample. Design, Setting, and Participants: Longitudinal study with a 2 1 ⁄2-year follow-up of 291 prospectively identi-fied treatment-seeking patients meeting Structured In-terview for Prodromal Syndromes criteria. The patients were recruited and underwent evaluation across 8 clini-cal research centers as part of the North American Pro-drome Longitudinal Study. Main Outcome Measure: Time to conversion to a fully psychotic form of mental illness. Results: The risk of conversion to psychosis was 35%, with a decelerating rate of transition during the 2 1 ⁄2-year follow-up. Five features assessed at baseline con-tributed uniquely to the prediction of psychosis: a ge-netic risk for schizophrenia with recent deterioration in functioning, higher levels of unusual thought content, higher levels of suspicion/paranoia, greater social im-pairment, and a history of substance abuse. Prediction algorithms combining 2 or 3 of these variables resulted in dramatic increases in positive predictive power (ie, 68%-80%) compared with the prodromal criteria alone. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that prospec-tive ascertainment of individuals at risk for psychosis is feasible, with a level of predictive accuracy comparable to that in other areas of preventive medicine. They pro-vide a benchmark for the rate and shape of the psycho-sis risk function against which standardized preventive intervention programs can be compared.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

There are no full text links


  • Tyrone D Cannon

  • Kristin Cadenhead

  • Barbara Cornblatt

  • Scott W Woods

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free