Homology analysis of pathogenic yersinia species yersinia enterocolitica, yersinia pseudotuberculosis, and yersinia pestis based on multilocus sequence typing

26Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We developed a multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme and used it to study the population structure and evolutionary relationships of three pathogenic Yersinia species. MLST of these three Yersinia species showed a complex of two clusters, one composed of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Yersinia pestis and the other composed of Yersinia enterocolitica. Within the first cluster, the predominant Y. pestis sequence type 90 (ST90) was linked to Y. pseudotuberculosis ST43 by one locus difference, and 81.25% of the ST43 strains were from serotype O:1b, supporting the hypothesis that Y. pestis descended from the O:1b serotype of Y. pseudotuberculosis. We also found that the worldwide-prevalent serotypes O:1a, O:1b, and O:3 were predominated by specific STs. The second cluster consisted of pathogenic and nonpathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains, two of which may not have identical STs. The pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains formed a relatively conserved group; most strains clustered within ST186 and ST187. Serotypes O:3, O:8, and O:9 were separated into three distinct blocks. Nonpathogenic Y. enterocolitica STs were more heterogeneous, reflecting genetic diversity through evolution. By providing a better and effective MLST procedure for use with the Yersinia community, valuable information and insights into the genetic evolutionary differences of these pathogens were obtained.Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duan, R., Liang, J., Shi, G., Cui, Z., Hai, R., Wang, P., … Wanga, X. (2014). Homology analysis of pathogenic yersinia species yersinia enterocolitica, yersinia pseudotuberculosis, and yersinia pestis based on multilocus sequence typing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 52(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02185-13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free