Hybridizing habitus and reflexivity: Towards an understanding of contemporary identity?

  • Adams M
  • 303

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 212

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

This article initially summarizes two dominant tropes in the sociology of identity in recent years, centred on the concepts of self-reflexivity and habitus, followed by an overview of extensive critical debate to which both have been subjected. It is claimed that the key criticisms of the extended reflexivity thesis gather around accusations of excessive voluntarism in accounting for contemporary identity, while critiques of Bourdieu's conceptualization of habitus deem it overly deterministic. In an attempt to move beyond the conceptual stalemate of two distinct approaches to identity, a number of hybridized accounts have emerged in social theory.The remainder of the article discusses a number of these accounts in relation to social change, and offers an initial consideration of their strengths and limitations. It is argued that the importance of post-reflexive choice must remain integral to any attempt at hybridization of these important terms, particularly in relation to the contemporary workings of social stratification.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Habitus
  • Identity
  • Reflexivity
  • Social change
  • Stratification

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Matthew Adams

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free