Identifying strategies for study selection in systematic reviews and maps

35Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Study selection in systematic reviews is prone to bias and there exist no commonly defined strategies of how to reduce the bias and resolve disagreement between researchers. This study aims at identifying strategies for bias reduction and disagreement resolution. A review of existing systematic reviews is conducted for study selection strategy identification. In total 13 different strategies have been identified. © 2011 IEEE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petersen, K., & Ali, N. B. (2011). Identifying strategies for study selection in systematic reviews and maps. In International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (pp. 351–354). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/esem.2011.46

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free