Journal article

The impact of differences in large-scale circulation output from climate models on the regional modeling of ozone and PM

Manders A, Van Meijgaard E, Mues A, Kranenburg R, Van Ulft L, Schaap M ...see all

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 12, issue 20 (2012) pp. 9441-9458

  • 29


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 25


    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference


Climate change may have an impact on air qual- ity (ozone, particulate matter) due to the strong dependency of air quality on meteorology. The effect is often studied us- ing a global climate model (GCM) to produce meteorolog- ical fields that are subsequently used by chemical transport models. However, climate models themselves are subject to large uncertainties and fail to reproduce the present-day cli- mate adequately. The present study illustrates the impact of these uncertainties on air quality. To this end, output from the SRES-A1B constraint transient runs with two GCMs, i.e. ECHAM5 and MIROC-hires, has been dynamically down- scaled with the regional climate model RACMO2 and used to force a constant emission run with the chemistry transport model LOTOS-EUROS in a one-way coupled run covering the period 1970–2060. Results from the two climate simulations have been com- pared with a RACMO2-LOTOS-EUROS (RLE) simulation forced by the ERA-Interim reanalysis for the period 1989– 2009. Both RLE ECHAMand RLE MIROCshowed consid- erable deviations from RLE ERA for daily maximum tem- perature, precipitation and wind speed. Moreover, sign and magnitude of these deviations depended on the region. The differences in average present-day concentrations between the simulations were equal to (RLE MIROC) or even larger than (RLE ECHAM) the differences in concentrations be- tween present-day and future climate (2041–2060). The cli- mate simulations agreed on a future increase in average sum- mer ozone daily maximum concentrations of 5–10 µgm−3 in parts of Southern Europe and a smaller increase in West- ern and Central Europe. Annual average PM10 concentra- tions increased 0.5–1.0 µgm−3 in North-West Europe and the the Po Valley, but these numbers are rather uncertain: over- all, changes for PM10 were small, both positive and nega- tive changes were found, and for many locations the two cli- mate runs did not agree on the sign of the change. This il- lustrates that results from individual climate runs can at best indicate tendencies and should therefore be interpreted with great care.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free