Impact of Infectious Diseases Specialists and Microbiological Data on the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Therapy for Bacteremia

  • Byl B
  • Clevenbergh P
  • Jacobs F
 et al. 
  • 42


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 227


    Citations of this article.


Antimicrobial therapy for 428 episodes of bacteremia in an 850-bed university hospital was prospectively evaluated for 1 year to measure the impact of two factors--blood culture results and the therapy chosen by infectious diseases specialists (IDSs)--on quality of treatment and outcome. Initial shock, a simplified acute physiology score of >15, and inappropriateness of the empirical treatment were independently associated with increased mortality. Empirical treatment was appropriate in 63% of the episodes. This proportion reached 78% for the episodes treated by IDSs, compared with 54% for the others (P < .001). After availability of blood culture results, the proportion of appropriate treatments increased to 94%, with 97% for IDS-treated patients and 89% for other patients (P = .008). IDSs more frequently shifted to oral antibiotics and used fewer broad-spectrum drugs. This study underlines the impact of blood culture results and of IDSs on the prescription of appropriate treatment for bacteremia and on the better use of antimicrobial drugs.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Baudouin Byl

  • Philippe Clevenbergh

  • Frédérique Jacobs

  • Marc J. Struelens

  • Francis Zech

  • Alain Kentos

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free