The impact of non-performance information on ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach

  • Spence J
  • Keeping L
  • 53

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 23

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Researchers have suggested that rater motives and the organizational context should be considered as sources of performance appraisal inaccuracies. A review of the performance appraisal literature revealed three primary non-performance factors that managers consider when rating employee performance: (a) Potential negative consequences of ratings, (b) organizational norms, and (c) the opportunity to advance self-interests. Using a policy- capturing methodology, the current study investigated if these three non-performance factors, as well as individual rater differences (e.g., conscientiousness, agreeableness, and perform- ance appraisal experience), influence performance ratings. A sample of 303 experienced managers rated the performance of a fictitious employee, featured in a series of hypothetical scenarios, in which the above information was manipulated. Using hierarchical linear modeling, the results revealed that each of the three non-performance related considerations accounted for variance incremental to objective employee performance. Managers’ perform- ance appraisal experience also predicted ratings, such that more experience was associated with lower ratings. These results provide support for the viewthat non-performance factors can be a substantive component of performance ratings.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Jeffrey R. Spence

  • Lisa M. Keeping

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free