Impact of preoperative quality as well as quantity of skeletal muscle on survival after resection of pancreatic cancer

  • S. O
  • T. K
  • Y. H
  • et al.
ISSN: 1532-7361
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Skeletal muscle depletion, referred to as sarcopenia, is predictive of mortality in patients undergoing digestive operations. The impact of muscle quality on outcomes, however, is unclear. This retrospective study investigated the impact of preoperative skeletal muscle quantity and quality on survival in patients undergoing resection of pancreatic cancer. Methods We investigated 230 patients who underwent resection of pancreatic cancer between 2004 and 2013. The quantity and quality of skeletal muscle, indicated by psoas muscle mass index (PMI) and intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC), were measured in preoperative computed tomography images. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were compared according to PMI and IMAC, and prognostic factors after pancreatic resection were assessed. Results The OS and RFS rates in patients with low PMI were lesser than in those with normal/high PMI (P < .001, P < .001, P = .003) (mean survival time = 21.5 and 56.5 months, respectively). Low PMI (low muscle mass) and high IMAC (low muscle quality) were independent prognostic factors of poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.999, P < .001; HR = 2.527, P < .001) and RFS (HR = 1.607, P = .007; HR = 1.640, P = .004), respectively. Conclusion Preoperative sarcopenia, indicating low quality and quantity of skeletal muscle, is closely related to mortality after resection of pancreatic cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

S., O., T., K., Y., H., Y., F., T., M., M., M., … S., U. (2015). Impact of preoperative quality as well as quantity of skeletal muscle on survival after resection of pancreatic cancer. Surgery (United States), 157(6), 1088–1098. Retrieved from http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L603106568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free