The impact of questioning method on measurement error in panel survey measures of benefit receipt: Evidence from a validation study

  • Lynn P
  • Jäckle A
  • Jenkins S
 et al. 
  • 21


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 7


    Citations of this article.


We assess measurement error in panel survey reports of social security benefit receipt, drawing on a unique validation study. Our aims are threefold. First, we quantify the incidence of measurement errors (under- and over-reporting). Second, we assess the extent to which this varies according to the questioning method that is used. Specifically, dependent interviewing has been proposed as a way to reduce under-reporting in some circumstances. We compare two versions of dependent interviewing with traditional independent interviewing in an experimental design. Third, we identify and assess new ways of reducing measurement error in panel surveys. We use data from a large-scale UK household panel survey and we consider six benefits. To assess the measurement error, a validation exercise was conducted, with administrative data on benefit receipt matched at the individual level to the survey microdata.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Dependent interviewing
  • Longitudinal survey
  • Social security
  • Survey errors
  • Under-reporting

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Peter Lynn

  • Annette Jäckle

  • Stephen P. Jenkins

  • Emanuela Sala

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free