Improved mechanistic foam simulation with foam catastrophe theory

  • Kam S
  • 31

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 47

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Recent experimental studies discovered that foam exhibits three different states (weak-foam, intermediate, and strong-foam states) reminiscent of catastrophe theory, and the strong-foam state consists of two distinct flow regimes (high-quality and low-quality regimes). No existing foam simulators can handle these concepts properly, especially when the simulation comes to near the limiting capillary pressure, Pc*(or the limiting water saturation, Sw*, equivalently) at which foam breaks down abruptly. Capturing the delicate feedback mechanism near Pc*has been a great challenge in mechanistic foam simulations. This study presents how to build a mechanistic foam simulator consistent with foam catastrophe theory and two steady-state strong-foam regimes. More importantly, this study for the first time resolves the issues on the instability and divergence of numerical simulation that take place near the physical discontinuity (i.e., Pc*or Sw*) in foam simulation. Results showed that it was necessary to choose an appropriate lamella-creation function to ensure the stability and convergence. Specifically (1) the lamella-creation function should increase rapidly above a certain pressure gradient ({down triangle, open}P), known as a minimum pressure gradient ({down triangle, open}Pmin) for lamella mobilization and division, to kick off active bubble generation, and (2) the function should also reach a plateau at high {down triangle, open}P at which foam rheology is governed by bubble coalescence rather than bubble generation. This new mechanistic simulator required five parameters to fit the steady-state foam catastrophe, the two flow regimes, and dynamic foam coreflood data, each of which was determined uniquely. The foam model in this study manifested that active (or, inactive) lamella-creation mechanism could be compensated by active (or, inactive) lamella-coalescence mechanism in the modeling process. The level of how active these mechanisms were, however, had a significant impact on the shift from weak-foam to strong-foam propagation during dynamic foam displacement. Simulations were extended not only to simultaneous injection of gas and surfactant solutions in a wide range of injection velocities, but also to alternating gas and surfactant solutions in which the dynamic mechanisms near Pc*is the key to field performance. Results were compared and verified with fractional flow analysis that was equipped with mechanistic foam mechanisms. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Foam
  • Foam catastrophe
  • Foam simulation
  • Limiting capillary pressure
  • Limiting water saturation

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Seung Ihl Kam

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free