Incidental findings: A common law approach

11Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Federal regulations governing human subjects research do not address key questions raised by incidental neuroimaging findings, including the scope of a researcher's disclosure with respect to the possibility of incidental findings and the question whether a researcher has an affirmative legal cuty to seek, detect, and report incidental findings. The scope of researcher duties may, however, be mapped with reference to common law doctrine, including fiduciary, tort, contract, and bailment theories of liability. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tovino, S. A. (2008). Incidental findings: A common law approach. Accountability in Research, 15(4), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620802388705

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free