Informal resolution of complaints against the police: A quasi-experimental test of restorative justice

28Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In many jurisdictions it is increasingly recognized that police complaints systems should contain a mixture of formal and less formal procedures, as well as allow for a variety of outcomes including remedial and punitive ones. Recent changes to the system for handling complaints against the police in England and Wales envisage an expanded role for local (informal) resolution, with a new range of options including restorative justice conferences. Yet little is known about whether complainants would welcome the option of a restorative justice conference or whether restorative processes would constitute an improvement on conventional practices. This article presents the results of a Nuffield Foundation funded study of these issues carried out in 2002-3 in two police force areas. The findings suggest that restorative processes can achieve moderately better results than conventional processes. While widespread implementation of this new approach is likely to prove problematic for many police services, a flexible approach to introducing changes, drawing on the experience of restorative practitioners in related areas, is likely to benefit complainants without creating dissatisfaction among police officers. © 2005 SAGE Publications London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Young, R., Hoyle, C., Cooper, K., & Hill, R. (2005, August). Informal resolution of complaints against the police: A quasi-experimental test of restorative justice. Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466802505055837

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free