Initial assessment of the acceptability of a push-pull Aedes aegypti control strategy in Iquitos, Peru and Kanchanaburi, Thailand

42Citations
Citations of this article
134Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As part of a larger research program evaluating chemical threshold levels for a Push-Pull intervention to reduce man-vector ( Aedes aegypti ) contact, this qualitative study explored local perceptions and strategies associated with mosquito control within dengue-endemic communities in Peru and Thailand. Focus groups were used to provide preliminary information that would identify possible public acceptance issues to the Push-Pull strategy in each site. Nine focus group discussions (total of 102 individuals) conducted between September 2008 and March 2009 examined several themes: 1) current mosquito control practices; 2) perceptions of spatial repellency and contact irritancy versus killing mosquitoes; and 3) initial perceptions toward mosquito host-seeking traps. Results indicate participants use householdlevel strategies for insect control that reveal familiarity with the concept of spatial repellent and contact irritant actions of chemicals and that placing traps in the peridomestic environment to remove repelled mosquitoes was acceptable. Preliminary evidence suggests a Push-Pull strategy should be well accepted in these locations. These results will be beneficial for developing future large scale push-pull interventions and are currently being used to guide insecticide application strategies in (entomological) proof-of-concept studies using experimental huts. Copyright © 2011 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paz-Soldan, V. A., Plasai, V., Morrison, A. C., Rios-Lopez, E. J., Guedez-Gonzales, S., Grieco, J. P., … Achee, N. L. (2011). Initial assessment of the acceptability of a push-pull Aedes aegypti control strategy in Iquitos, Peru and Kanchanaburi, Thailand. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 84(2), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2011.09-0615

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free