The intermediate disturbance hypothesis applies to tropical forests, but disturbance contributes little to tree diversity

  • Bongers F
  • Poorter L
  • Hawthorne W
 et al. 
  • 534

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 86

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) predicts local species diversity to be maximal at an intermediate level of disturbance. Developed to explain species maintenance and diversity patterns in species-rich ecosystems such as tropical forests, tests of IDH in tropical forest remain scarce, small-scale and contentious. We use an unprecedented large-scale dataset (2504 one-hectare plots and 331,567 trees) to examine whether IDH explains tree diversity variation within wet, moist and dry tropical forests, and we analyse the underlying mechanism by determining responses within functional species groups. We find that disturbance explains more variation in diversity of dry than wet tropical forests. Pioneer species numbers increase with disturbance, shade-tolerant species decrease and intermediate species are indifferent. While diversity indeed peaks at intermediate disturbance levels little variation is explained outside dry forests, and disturbance is less important for species richness patterns in wet tropical rain forests than previously thought.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Disturbance
  • Ghana
  • Guild
  • Intermediate disturbance hypothesis
  • Shade tolerance
  • Species density
  • Species richness
  • Tropical forest

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free