Is the internet a better public sphere? comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany

  • Gerhards J
  • Schäfer M
  • 282

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 94

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Normative theorists of the public sphere, such as Jürgen Habermas, have been very critical of the ‘old’ mass media, which were seen as unable to promote free and plural societal communication. The advent of the internet, in contrast, gave rise to hopes that it would make previously marginalized actors and arguments more visible to a broader public. To assess these claims, this article compares the internet and mass media communication. It distinguishes three levels of both the offline and the online public sphere, which differ in their structural prerequisites, in their openness for participation and in their influence on the wider society. Using this model, the article compares the levels that are most strongly structured and most influential for the wider society: the mass media and communication as organized by search engines. Using human genome research and analysing Germany and the USA, the study looks at which actors, evaluations and frames are present in the print mass media and on websites, and finds that internet communication does not differ significantly from the offline debate in the print media.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Biotechnology
  • Civil society
  • Content analysis
  • Internet
  • Print media
  • Public sphere
  • Search engines

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Jürgen Gerhards

  • Mike S. Schäfer

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free