Intimate partner violence research in the health care setting: What are appropriate and feasible methodological standards?

  • Zink T
  • Putnam F
  • 4

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The past 20 years of research has exposed the profound cost of intimate partner violence (IPV) in health care problems and health care dollars for victims and bystanders. As a result, professional organizations encourage clinicians to identify IPV victims and to refer them to community resources. To date there is little evidence to show the value of these efforts, and many completed studies are criticized for methodological weaknesses. IPV studies are challenging to design, and the double-blind randomized controlled trial may be an impossible standard. To move forward, funders and study committees are encouraged to reassess the standards for IPV research methodologies.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Battered Women
  • Crisis Intervention/standards
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Research Design/ standards
  • Spouse Abuse/economics/ prevention & control
  • United States
  • Women's Health Services/economics/ standards
  • Women's Health/economics

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • T Zink

  • F Putnam

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free