Intravitreal injections using a novel conjunctival mould: A comparison with a conventional technique

  • Ratnarajan G
  • Nath R
  • Appaswamy S
 et al. 
  • 16


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 6


    Citations of this article.


AIMS: The aims were to compare a novel conjunctival mould used to assist the delivery of intravitreal drugs to a conventional technique with respect to patient, surgeon and cost benefit.

METHODS: A prospective review of 200 intravitreal injections was undertaken, 100 using a 'conventional' freehand technique (group 1) and 100 using a novel conjunctival mould (group 2). Intraoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, patient preference, surgeon perception of the ease of insertion of the conjunctival mould were recorded as well as a cost comparison.

RESULTS: VAS pain score in the conventional group was 2.58 compared to 1.38 in the conjunctival mould group (p
CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in the VAS pain score with the conjunctival mould was statistically significant (p

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Gokulan Ratnarajan

  • Remin Nath

  • Shivashankar Appaswamy

  • Sarah Lucie Watson

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free